Talking past each other: Academic and media framing of literacy

Katherine Ognyanova
Published Online: May 31, 2010
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (548 KB)


Bennett, W. L. (2007). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth (pp. 1-24) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

boyd, d. (2007). Social Network Sites: Public, Private, or What? The Knowledge Tree, (13, May). Retrieved from

boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.

Buckingham, D. (2007a). Beyond technology: children’s learning in the age of digital culture. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Buckingham, D. (2007b). Digital Media Literacies: rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 43-55.

Buckingham, D. (2007). Introducing identity. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. (pp. 1-22). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Carley, K. M. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological methodology, 75-126.

Castells, M. (2005). Informationalism, networks, and the network society: A theoretical blueprint. In M. Castells (Ed.), The network society: A cross-cultural perspective: Edward Elgar Publishing, Incorporated.

Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Danowski, J. A. (1993). WORDij: A word-pair approach to information retrieval. NIST special publication(500207), 131-136.

Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). What is agenda-setting? Communication concepts: Agenda-setting (pp. 1-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

Doerfel, M., & Barnett, G. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 25(4), 589-603.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. The Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

Fanton, J. (2007). New Generations, New Media Challenges. St. Louis Post Dispatch.

Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. (2008). Digital Media and Youth: Unparalleled Opportunity and Unprecedented Responsibility. In A. Flanagin & M. Metzger (Eds.), Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.

Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20-20.

Gee, J. P. (2009). Digital Media and Learning as an Emerging Field, Part I: How We Got Here. International Journal of Learning, 1(2), 13-23.

Gee, J. P. (2010). New Digital Media and Learning as an Emerging Area and “Worked Examples” as One Way Forward. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience: Harvard University Press.

Golan, G. (2006). Inter-Media Agenda Setting And Global News Coverage: Assessing the influence of the New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 323.

Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The Participation Divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information Communication and Society, 11(2), 239.

Hellsten, I., Dawson, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Implicit media frames: Automated analysis of public debate on artificial sweeteners. Public Understanding of Science.

Hobbs, R., & Jensen, A. (2009). The Past, Present, and Future of Media Literacy Education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1(1).

Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., et al. (2008). Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project. The John D. and Cathrine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning.

James, C., Davis, K., Flores, A., Francis, J., Pettingill, L., Rundle, M., et al. (2008). Young People, Ethics, and the New Digital Media: A synthesis from the Good Play Project. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press..

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NYU Press.

Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robinson, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation..

Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241.

Kelly, J. (2008). Pride of Place: Mainstream Media and the Networked Public Sphere Media Re:public: Berkman Center for Internet & Society.

Kennedy, T. L. M., & Wellman, B. (2008). Networked families. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

Kiousis, S. (2004). Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 US presidential election. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 71-87.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. Open University Press.

Lee, J. K. (2007). The effect of The Internet on homogeneity of the media agenda: A test of the fragmentation thesis. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 745.

Livingstone, S. (2003). The changing nature and uses of media literacy. Mediaculture Online. Retrieved from

Livingstone, S. (2007). The challenge of engaging youth online: contrasting producers’ and teenagers’ interpretations of websites. European Journal of Communication, 22(2), 165.

Messner, M., & DiStaso, M. (2008). The source cycle: How traditional media and weblogs use each other as sources. Journalism Studies, 9(3), 447-463.

Murphy, P. (2001). Framing the nicotine debate: A cultural approach to risk. Health Communication, 13(2), 119-140.

Murphy, P., & Maynard, M. (2000). Framing the Genetic Testing Issue. Science Communication, 22(2), 133-153.

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from website:

Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35–65). In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life.  Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Reese, S. D. (2007). The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148-154.

Rheingold, H. (2007). Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning (pp. 97-118).

Rice, R. E., & Danowski, J. A. (1993). Is it really just like a fancy answering machine? Comparing semantic networks of different types of voice mail users. Journal of Business Communication, 30(4), 369.

Samkin, G., & Schneider, A. (2008). Adding scientific rigour to qualitative data analysis: an illustrative example. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 5(3), 207-238.

Scott, P. (2005). Knowledge workers: social, task and semantic network analysis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(3), 257-277.

Sefton-Green, J., Alvermann, D., Gee, J., & Nixon, H. (2006). Youth, technology, and media cultures. Review of Research in Education, 30, 279.

Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native – myth and reality. Perspectives, 61(4), 364-379.

Shen, F., & Edwards, H. H. (2005). Economic Individualism, Humanitarianism, and Welfare Reform: A Value-Based Account of Framing Effects. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 795-809.

The MacArthur Foundation. (2009). Digital Learning Website.  Retrieved December 2, 2009, from

Tian, Y., & Stewart, C. (2005). Framing the SARS crisis: A computer-assisted text analysis of CNN and BBC online news reports of SARS. Asian Journal of Communication, 15(3), 289-301.

Biographical Statement

Katherine Ognyanova is a Doctoral Candidate in Communication at the University of Southern California. She does research with a broad focus on transformations of the media system and social aspects of technology. Katherine is interested in the application of network analysis methods to communication and media studies. As a research assistant at USC, she works on projects exploring scientific collaboration and virtual team formation and studies the impact of new media on engagement and intergroup dialogue in local communities. Katherine holds a B.Sc. in Computer Science and M.A. in Virtual Culture from the University of Sofia, as well as an M.A. in Communication from USC.

Comments are closed.

Digital Culture & Education (DCE) is an international inter-disciplinary peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the exploration of digital technology’s impacts on identity, education, art, society, culture and narrative within social, political, economic, cultural and historical contexts.

We are interested in empirical and conceptual approaches to theorising globalisation, development, sustainability, wellbeing, subjectivities, networks, new media, gaming, multimodality, literacies and related issues and their implications for how we educate and why. We encourage submissions in a variety of modes and invite guest editors to propose special editions.

DCE is an online, open access journal. It does not charge for article submission or for publication. All manuscripts submitted to DCE are double blind reviewed. Articles are published through a Creative Commons (CC) License and made available for viewing and download on a bespoke page at


Follow us on Twitter at @DigitalCultureE

The scale and speed at which digital culture has entered all aspects of our lives is unprecedented. We publish articles and digital works including eBooks (published under Creative Commons Licenses) that address the use of digital (and other) technologies and how they are taken up across diverse institutional and non-institutional contexts. Scholarly reviews of books, conferences, exhibits, games, software and hardware are also encouraged.

All manuscripts submitted to Digital Culture & Education (DCE) are double-blind reviewed where the identity of the reviewers and the authors are not disclosed to either party.

Digital Culture & Education (DCE) does not have article submission charges. Read more

Manuscripts should include:
1. Cover sheet with author(s) contact details and brief biographical statement(s).

Instructions for Authors

Manuscripts submitted should be original, not under review by any other publication and not published elsewhere.
The expected word count for submissions to the journal is approximately 7500 words, excluding references. Each paper should be accompanied by an abstract of up to 200 words.  Authors planning to submit manuscripts significantly longer than 7500 words should first contact the Editor at

All pages should be numbered. Footnotes to the text should be avoided and endnotes should be used instead. Sponsorship of research reported (e.g. by research councils, government departments and agencies, etc.) should be declared.

Read more

Digital Culture & Education (DCE) invites submissions on any aspect of digital culture and education.  We welcome submissions of articles and digital works that address the use of digital (and other) technologies and how they are taken up across diverse institutional and non-institutional contexts. For further inquiries and submission of work, send an email to editor@