Digital Technologies and performative pedagogies: Repositioning the visual

Kathryn Grushka & Debra Donnelly
Published Online: May 31, 2010
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (524 KB)


Alexander, B. K., Anderson, G. L., & Gallegos, B. P.(2004). Performance theories in education: Power, pedagogy, and the politics of identity. New Jersey, USA; London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Anstey, M. & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies, Kensington Gardens, SA: Australian Literacy Educators.

Alvermann, D. E. (Ed.), (2002). Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.

Bolt, B. (2004). Art beyond representation, the performative power of the image. London: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

Buckingham, D.(2007). Digital media literacies: rethinking media education in the age of the internet Research, Comparative and International Education, 2 (1), 43-55.

Bulter, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York and London: Routledge.

Burnett, C. (2009). Personal digital literacies versus classroom literacies: Investigating pre-service teachers’ digital lives in and beyond the classroom. In Carrinton, V. & Robinson, M (Eds.). Digital literacies: social learning & classroom practices. London: Sage.

Carrington, V & Marsh, J. (2005). Digital childhood and youth: New texts, new literacies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26, (3), 279-285.

Carrington, V. & Robinson, M. (2009). Digital literacies: social learning and classroom practice. Singapore: Sage Publications Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd.

Conquergood, D. (1998). Beyond the text: Toward a performative cultural politics. In S.J. Dailey (Ed.) The future of performance studies: Vision and revisions, (pp 25-36), Annadale, V.A.: National Communication Association.

Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2008). Ubiquitous learning: An agenda for educational transformation. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning, Retrieved 20/02/10 from

Dowdall, C. (2009). Masters and critics: children as producers of online digital texts. In Carrinton, V. & Robinson, M (Eds.). Digital literacies: Social learning & classroom practices. London: Sage.

Deleuze, G. (1990). Negotiations (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

Denzin, N. K. (2005). Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation. In  Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publication.

Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publication.

Dikovitskaya, M. (2006). Visual culture. The study of the visual after the cultural turn. London: MIT Press.

Emme, M. (2001). Visuality in teaching and research: Activist art education. Studies in Art Education, 43 (1), 57-74.

Finley, S. (2005).  Arts-based inquiry, performing revolutionary pedagogy. In N.Denzin, & Y.Lincoln (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed., (pp. 681-694). London: Sage Publication.

Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluation research in education 6th Ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

Freebody, P. & Luke, A. (2003). Literacy as engaging with new forms of life: The four roles model. In M.Anstey & G.Bull (Eds.), The literacy lexicon (2nd ed.) Sydney: Pearson Education Australia

Giroux, H.A. (1996). Fugitive cultures: Race, violence and youth. London: Routledge.

Goodson, I. & Deakin-Crick, R. (2009). Curriculum as narration: Tales from the children of the colonised. The Curriculum Journal, 20(3), 225-236.

Grierson, E. (2003). Visual intelligence: A post 9/11 discursive approach to questions of representation and cultural signifying practices in art education. Australian Art Education, 26 (2) 7-11.

Holman Jones. S. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In N.Denzin, & Y.Lincoln (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed.). London: Sage, Thousand Oaks.

Jones, A. (2007). 1970/2007: Why does feminism still matter in the visual arts?  Paper

presented at Taking a Hard Look: Gender and Visual Culture Conference, Institute for Women’s and Gender Studies, University of Pretoria, July, Pretoria.

Kalantzis, M. (2005).  Elements of a science of education, The Radford Lecture,

The Australian Educational Researcher, 33(2), 15-31.

Kalantizis, M. & Cope, B. (2005). Learning by design, Melbourne, Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.

Kellner, D. (1992). Popular culture and the construction of postmodern identities. In L. Scott, &  J. Friedman.(Eds.), Modernity and identity, Oxford UK & Cambridge ESA: Blackwell.

Kincheloe, J. (2005). On the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 323- 350.

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge

Kress, G. & Van Leeuween, T. (2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design

(2nd ed.), New York: Routledge.

Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2006). Discussing new literacies, Language Art, 84 (1) 78-86

Lovell, T. (2003). Resisting with authority: historical specificity, agency and the

performative self. Theory, Culture and Society, 20 (1), 1-17.

McNay, L. (1999). Subject, psyche and agency: The work of Judith Butler. Theory Culture & Society, 16(2), 175-193.

Mcquillan, M. (Ed.) (2000).  The narrative reader. London, New York: Routledge.

Meskimmon, M. (1997). Visuality: The new, new art history? Art History, 20 (2), 331-335.

Mirzoeff, N. (Ed.). (1998). The visual culture reader, New York: Routledge.

New London Group. (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), 60-92.

Rennert-Ariev, P. & College, L. (2005). A theoretical model for the authentic

assessment of teaching. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10 (2), 1-11.

Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials (2nd Ed.). London: Thousand Oaks, Sage.

Stafford, B. (1996). Good looking: Essays on the virtues of images. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Stafford, B. (2007). Echo objects: The cognitive work of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research, inquiry in the visual arts. Los Angeles: Sage.

Thompson, N. (2004). Strategic visuality: A project by four artists/researches: Trevor Paglen, the Spectulative Archive, J. M.Puett with J. Colombo, and the Centre for Tactical Magic. Art Journal, 63(1), 30-40. Retrieved 10/10/05 from,

Walsh, C. (2007). Creativity as capital in the literacy classroom: youth as multimodal designers, Literacy, 41, (2), 79-85.

Zammit, K. & Downes, T. (2002). New learning environments and the multiliterate individual: A framework for educators. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25 (2), 24-36.

Biographical Statements

Kath Grushka and Debra Donnelly are academics working at the School of Education, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. Both have extensive experience across a range of educational settings and work in undergraduate and postgraduate teacher education degree programs. Kath Grushka is an artist and art educator with research interests in curriculum design and theory in visual arts, teacher identify and the role of reflective practice, and visual culture and technology. Debra Donnelly is a history educator with research interest in historical understanding pedagogies, new media and historical consciousness and pre-service teacher education.



Comments are closed.

Digital Culture & Education (DCE) is an international inter-disciplinary peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the exploration of digital technology’s impacts on identity, education, art, society, culture and narrative within social, political, economic, cultural and historical contexts.

We are interested in empirical and conceptual approaches to theorising globalisation, development, sustainability, wellbeing, subjectivities, networks, new media, gaming, multimodality, literacies and related issues and their implications for how we educate and why. We encourage submissions in a variety of modes and invite guest editors to propose special editions.

DCE is an online, open access journal. It does not charge for article submission or for publication. All manuscripts submitted to DCE are double blind reviewed. Articles are published through a Creative Commons (CC) License and made available for viewing and download on a bespoke page at


Follow us on Twitter at @DigitalCultureE

The scale and speed at which digital culture has entered all aspects of our lives is unprecedented. We publish articles and digital works including eBooks (published under Creative Commons Licenses) that address the use of digital (and other) technologies and how they are taken up across diverse institutional and non-institutional contexts. Scholarly reviews of books, conferences, exhibits, games, software and hardware are also encouraged.

All manuscripts submitted to Digital Culture & Education (DCE) are double-blind reviewed where the identity of the reviewers and the authors are not disclosed to either party.

Digital Culture & Education (DCE) does not have article submission charges. Read more

Manuscripts should include:
1. Cover sheet with author(s) contact details and brief biographical statement(s).

Instructions for Authors

Manuscripts submitted should be original, not under review by any other publication and not published elsewhere.
The expected word count for submissions to the journal is approximately 7500 words, excluding references. Each paper should be accompanied by an abstract of up to 200 words.  Authors planning to submit manuscripts significantly longer than 7500 words should first contact the Editor at

All pages should be numbered. Footnotes to the text should be avoided and endnotes should be used instead. Sponsorship of research reported (e.g. by research councils, government departments and agencies, etc.) should be declared.

Read more

Digital Culture & Education (DCE) invites submissions on any aspect of digital culture and education.  We welcome submissions of articles and digital works that address the use of digital (and other) technologies and how they are taken up across diverse institutional and non-institutional contexts. For further inquiries and submission of work, send an email to editor@