“You should be reading, not texting”: Understanding classroom text messaging in the constant contact society

Sarah Lohnes Watulak
Published Online: Oct 15, 2010
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (732 KB)

References

Alvermann, D. (2008). Why bother theorizing adolescents’ online literacies for classroom practice and research? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 8-19.

Alvermann, D., Huddleston, A., & Hagood, M. (2004). What could professional wrestling and school literacies possibly have in common? Journal of Adult & Adolescent Literacy, 47(7), 532-540.

Campbell, S. (2006). Perceptions of mobile phone in college classrooms: Ringing, cheating, and classroom policies. Communication Education, 55(3), 280-294.

Carrington, V. (2005). Txting: The end of civilization (again)? Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 161-175.

Ching, C. C., & Vigdor, L. (2005). Technobiographies: Perspectives from education and the arts. Paper presented at the First International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Champaign, IL.

Clark, L. (2005). The constant contact generation. In S. Mazzarella (Ed.), Girl Wide Web: Girls, the Internet, and the negotiation of identity (pp. 203-221). New York: Peter Lang.

Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Gilroy, M. (2004). Invasion of the classroom cell phones. Education Digest, 69(6), 56-60.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.

Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Holland, D., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement, and college culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ito, M., & Okabe, D. (2005). Intimate connections: Contextualizing Japanese youth and mobile messaging. In R. Harper, L. Palen, & A. Taylor (Eds.), The inside text: Social, cultural, and design perspectives on SMS (pp. 127-145). Norwell: Springer.

Jaschik, S. (2008, April 2). If you text in class, this prof will leave. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/02/texting

Katz, J. E. (2005). Mobile phones in educational settings. In K. Nyiri (Ed.), A sense of place: The global and the local in mobile communication (pp. 305-317). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel M. (2007). Sampling the “new” in new literacies. In M. Knobel and C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1-24). New York: Peter Lang.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (May 2008).  The “twoness” of learn 2.0:  Challenges and prospects of a would-be new learning paradigm.  Keynote presented at the Learning 2.0: From Preschool to Beyond conference, Montclair, NJ.

Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones.  Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org

Ling, R., & Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In J. Katz (Ed.), Perpetual contact (pp. 139-169). Port Chester: Cambridge University Press.

Merriam, S. (1997). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Plester, B., Wood, C., & Joshi, P. (2009). Exploring the relationship between children’s knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 145–161.

Scornavacca, E., Huff, S., & Marshall, S. (2009). Mobile phones in the classroom: If you can’t beat them, join them. Communications of the ACM 52(4), 142-146.

Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stone, J. C. (2007). Popular websites in adolescents’ out-of- school lives: Critical lessons on literacy. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 49–65). New York: Peter Lang.

Thurlow, C. (2003). Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1). Retrieved from http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003.html

Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/thurlow.html

Vasudevan, L. (2010). Education remix: New media, literacies, and the emerging digital geographies. Digital Culture & Education, 2(1), 62-82.  Retrieved from http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com

Wallace, W. (1966). Student culture: Social structure and continuity in a liberal arts college. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.


Comments are closed.


Digital Culture & Education (DCE) is an international inter-disciplinary peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the exploration of digital technology’s impacts on identity, education, art, society, culture and narrative within social, political, economic, cultural and historical contexts.

We are interested in empirical and conceptual approaches to theorising globalisation, development, sustainability, wellbeing, subjectivities, networks, new media, gaming, multimodality, literacies and related issues and their implications for how we educate and why. We encourage submissions in a variety of modes and invite guest editors to propose special editions.

DCE is an online, open access journal. It does not charge for article submission or for publication. All manuscripts submitted to DCE are double blind reviewed. Articles are published through a Creative Commons (CC) License and made available for viewing and download on a bespoke page at www.digitalcultureandeducation.com

 

Follow us on Twitter at @DigitalCultureE


The scale and speed at which digital culture has entered all aspects of our lives is unprecedented. We publish articles and digital works including eBooks (published under Creative Commons Licenses) that address the use of digital (and other) technologies and how they are taken up across diverse institutional and non-institutional contexts. Scholarly reviews of books, conferences, exhibits, games, software and hardware are also encouraged.

All manuscripts submitted to Digital Culture & Education (DCE) are double-blind reviewed where the identity of the reviewers and the authors are not disclosed to either party.

Digital Culture & Education (DCE) does not have article submission charges. Read more


Manuscripts should include:
1. Cover sheet with author(s) contact details and brief biographical statement(s).

Instructions for Authors

Manuscripts submitted should be original, not under review by any other publication and not published elsewhere.
The expected word count for submissions to the journal is approximately 7500 words, excluding references. Each paper should be accompanied by an abstract of up to 200 words.  Authors planning to submit manuscripts significantly longer than 7500 words should first contact the Editor at editor@digitalcultureandeducation.com

All pages should be numbered. Footnotes to the text should be avoided and endnotes should be used instead. Sponsorship of research reported (e.g. by research councils, government departments and agencies, etc.) should be declared.

Read more


Digital Culture & Education (DCE) invites submissions on any aspect of digital culture and education.  We welcome submissions of articles and digital works that address the use of digital (and other) technologies and how they are taken up across diverse institutional and non-institutional contexts. For further inquiries and submission of work, send an email to editor@ digitalcultureandeducation.com